In considering our class discussion today, I wanted to
continue the discussion of objectivity versus subjectivity. However, rather
than continuing with the example of Arabella, I wanted to look more closely at
other characters. First and foremost, as Lucy is the other prominent female
within the novel, so far, it seems that her objectivity or subjectivity should
come into consideration. In considering her role, she is a ladies’ maid of
sorts to Arabella and does her bidding, despite what emotions she should have
to the contrary. For example, she transcribes a response to Mr. Hervey but
cannot remain impartial in a situation which is of little real concern to her,
"This news put Lucy into a terrible fright: She told her Apprehensions to
her brother; which being such as her Lady had put into her head, were now
confirmed by Mr. Hervey's Illness..." (16). This passage alone, shows the
complexity of Lucy's position. She is supposed to not only be the object of use
to Arabella but also should remain impartial in Arbela’s affairs, but through
her concern and seeming independent thought, she attempts to gain agency.
However, this agency still puts her into an object role in that it is 'such as
her Lady had put into her head.' Due to her inability to separate her own life
from the life she has as Arabella's maid, the object vs. subject debate
surrounding Lucy becomes incredibly complicated and murky. In addition, The
Marquis as the raiser of and guardian to Arabella seems to be an important
person in terms of object vs. subject. Due to his wealth and position, the
Marquis has a great deal of agency, both with the manner in which Arabella has
been raised and how she lives in addition to further promoting and provoking pursuit
of Arabella. However, his initial proposal to Arabella concerning her marriage
to him proves unsuccessful, “The Impropriety of receiving a Lover of a Father’s
recommendation appeared in its strongest Light. What Lady in Romance ever
married the Man that was chose for her?” (27). Although based in fantastical
and unrealistic expectation of family, love and marriage, Arabella’s notions of
what constitute her own ‘reality’ are what prevents her father from being a
consistent subject with power over everyone, despite his status and wealth. It
seems then that there are no clear definitions of someone who is entirely an
object and entirely a subject within the novel so far. Although not overtly
drawn to attention within the context of the novel itself, agency, especially
for women in this time period is a huge issue. With so much attention on the
debate over the ‘proper place’ for a woman cropping up in this century, through
female novelists and through The Female
Spectator, the presence of agency within the novel, especially knowing that
this novel is a satire of the stories of Don Quixote, can help to shed light on
both the realistic and fantastical ways that Arabella in particular, deals with
the issue of female power.
I like that you focused on agency in the novel, and it's something we should talk about at more length in class, now that we're further into the novel, and we have multiple characters with different agendas competing. What did you think of the scene where Arabella prepares Lucy to tell her history?
ReplyDelete